Advertisement

Evaluating a neonatal intensive care unit MRSA surveillance programme using agent-based network modelling

      Summary

      Background

      Surveillance for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is a commonplace infection prevention strategy, yet the optimal frequency with which to monitor the unit is unknown.

      Aim

      To compare various surveillance frequencies using simulation modelling.

      Methods

      One hundred NICU networks of 52 infants were simulated over a six-month period to assess MRSA transmission. Unit-wide surveillance occurred every N weeks where N={1,2,3,4}, and was compared with the current NICU policy of dynamic surveillance (i.e. weekly when at least one positive screen, otherwise every three weeks). For each surveillance period, colonized infants received a decolonization regimen (56% effective) and were moved to isolation rooms, if available.

      Findings

      As the surveillance frequency increased, the mean number of MRSA-colonized infants decreased, from a high of 2.9 (four-weekly monitoring) to a low of 0.6 (weekly monitoring) detected per episode. The mean duration of colonization decreased from 307 h (four-weekly monitoring) to 61 h (weekly monitoring). Meanwhile, the availability of isolation rooms followed an inverse relationship: as surveillance frequency increased, the availability of isolation rooms decreased (61% isolation success rate for four-weekly monitoring vs 49% success rate for weekly monitoring). The dynamic policy performed similar to a biweekly programme.

      Conclusions

      An effective MRSA surveillance programme needs to balance resource availability with potential for harm due to longer colonization periods and opportunity for development of invasive disease. While more frequent monitoring led to greater use of a decolonization regimen, it also reduced the likelihood of isolation rooms being available.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hospital Infection
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Popoola V.O.
        • Budd A.
        • Wittig S.M.
        • Ross T.
        • Aucott S.W.
        • Perl T.M.
        • et al.
        Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infections in a neonatal intensive care unit despite active surveillance cultures and decolonisation: challenges for infection prevention.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35: 412-418
        • Popoola V.O.
        • Colantuoni E.
        • Suwantarat N.
        • Pierce R.
        • Carroll K.C.
        • Aucott S.W.
        • et al.
        Active surveillance cultures and decolonisation to reduce Staphylococcus aureus infections in the neonatal intensive care unit.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37: 381-387
        • Washam M.
        • Woltmann J.
        • Haberman B.
        • Haslam D.
        • Staat M.A.
        Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: 1388-1393
        • Goldstein N.D.
        • Eppes S.C.
        • Mackley A.
        • Tuttle D.
        • Paul D.A.
        A network model of hand hygiene: how good is good enough to stop the spread of MRSA?.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 28: 1-8
        • Jimenez-Truque N.
        • Tedeschi S.
        • Saye E.J.
        • McKenna B.D.
        • Langdon W.
        • Wright J.P.
        • et al.
        Relationship between maternal and neonatal Staphylococcus aureus colonisation.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 129: e1252-e1259
        • Denkel L.A.
        • Schwab F.
        • Kola A.
        • Leistner R.
        • Garten L.
        • von Weizsäcker K.
        • et al.
        The mother as most important risk factor for colonisation of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E).
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014; 69: 2230-2237
        • Pierce R.
        • Lessler J.
        • Popoola V.O.
        • Milstone A.M.
        Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition risk in an endemic neonatal intensive care unit with an active surveillance culture and decolonisation programme.
        J Hosp Infect. 2017; 95: 91-97
        • Ho H.J.
        • Poh B.F.
        • Choudhury S.
        • Krishnan P.
        • Ang B.
        • Chow A.
        Alcohol handrubbing and chlorhexidine handwashing are equally effective in removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from health care workers' hands: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43: 1246-1248
        • Newnam K.M.
        Surveillance and isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation in the neonatal intensive care unit.
        Adv Neonatal Care. 2016; 16: 298-307
        • Jenness S.M.
        • Goodreau S.M.
        • Morris M.
        EpiModel: an R package for mathematical modeling of infectious disease over networks.
        J Stat Softw. 2018; 84: 1-47
        • Lyles R.D.
        • Trick W.E.
        • Hayden M.K.
        • Lolans K.
        • Fogg L.
        • Logan L.K.
        • et al.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevention Epicenters Program. Regional epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among critically ill children in a state with mandated active surveillance.
        J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2016; 5: 409-416
        • Huang S.S.
        • Septimus E.
        • Kleinman K.
        • Moody J.
        • Hickok J.
        • Avery T.R.
        • et al.
        CDC Prevention Epicenters Program; AHRQ DECIDE Network and Healthcare-Associated Infections Program. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 2255-2265
        • Nelson M.U.
        • Bizzarro M.J.
        • Dembry L.M.
        • Baltimore R.S.
        • Gallagher P.G.
        One size does not fit all: why universal decolonization strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in adult intensive care units may be inappropriate for neonatal intensive care units.
        J Perinatol. 2014; 34: 653-655
        • Macnow T.
        • O'Toole D.
        • DeLaMora P.
        • Murray M.
        • Rivera K.
        • Whittier S.
        • et al.
        Utility of surveillance cultures for antimicrobial resistant organisms in infants transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit.
        Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013; 32: e443-e450
        • Schultz E.D.
        • Tanaka D.T.
        • Goldberg R.N.
        • Benjamin Jr., D.K.
        • Smith P.B.
        Effect of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in the neonatal intensive care unit on total hospital cost.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30: 383-385
        • Washam M.C.
        • Ankrum A.
        • Haberman B.E.
        • Staat M.A.
        • Haslam D.B.
        Risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in the neonatal intensive care unit: a matched case–case–control study.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018; 39: 46-52
        • Nübel U.
        • Nachtnebel M.
        • Falkenhorst G.
        • Benzler J.
        • Hecht J.
        • Kube M.
        • et al.
        MRSA transmission on a neonatal intensive care unit: epidemiological and genome-based phylogenetic analyses.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8e54898