Research Article| Volume 75, ISSUE 2, P116-119, June 2010

Download started.


Effects of ‘bare below the elbows’ policy on hand contamination of 92 hospital doctors in a district general hospital


      Despite a lack of evidence the UK's Department of Health introduced a policy of ‘bare below the elbows’ attire in order to try to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection. This study investigates the link between this state of dress and hand contamination. A prospective observational study of doctors working in a district general hospital was carried out. The fingertips of each hand were imprinted onto culture medium, and resultant growth assessed for number of colony-forming units and presence of clinically significant pathogens or multiply resistant organisms. These findings were correlated with attire, grade, sex and specialty. Ninety-two doctors were recruited of whom 49 were ‘bare below the elbows’ compliant and 43 were not. There was no statistically significant difference between those doctors who were ‘bare below the elbows’ and those that were not, either for the number of colony-forming units or for the presence of clinically significant organisms. No multiply resistant organisms were cultured from doctors' hands. ‘Bare below the elbows’ attire is not related to the degree of contamination on doctors' fingertips or the presence of clinically significant pathogens. Further studies are required to establish whether investment in doctors' uniforms and patient education campaigns are worthwhile.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Hospital Infection
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Department of Health
        Uniform and workwear: an evidence base for developing local policy.
        DoH, London2007
        • Jones A.
        Bare below the elbows: a brief history of surgeon attire and infection.
        BJU Int. 2008; 102: 665-666
        • Ardolino A.
        • Williams L.A.
        • Crook T.B.
        • Taylor H.P.
        Bare below the elbows: what do patients think?.
        J Hosp Infect. 2009; 71: 291-293
        • Henderson J.
        • McCracken S.
        Bare below the elbows: clinical value of a wristwatch.
        Br Med J. 2008; 336: 10
        • Magos A.
        • Maclean A.
        • Baker D.
        • Goddard N.
        • Ogunbiyi O.
        Bare below the elbows: a cheap soundbite.
        Br Med J. 2007; 335: 684
        • Wong D.
        • Nye K.
        • Hollis P.
        Microbial flora on doctors' white coats.
        Br Med J. 1991; 303: 1602-1604
        • Loh W.
        • Ng V.V.
        • Holton J.
        Bacterial flora on the white coats of medical students.
        J Hosp Infect. 2000; 45: 65-68
        • Hartley J.C.
        • Mackay A.D.
        • Scott G.M.
        Wrist watches must be removed before washing hands.
        Br Med J. 1999; 318: 328
        • Kampf G.
        • Ostermeyer C.
        • Heeg P.
        • Paulson D.
        Evaluation of two methods of determining the efficacies of two alcohol-based hand rubs for surgical hand antisepsis.
        Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72: 3856-3861
        • Girou E.
        • Loyeau S.
        • Legrand P.
        • Oppein F.
        • Brun-Buisson C.
        Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial.
        Br Med J. 2002; 325: 362
        • Zaragoza M.
        • Salles M.
        • Gomez J.
        • Bayas J.M.
        • Trilla A.
        Handwashing with soap or alcoholic solutions? A randomized clinical trial of its effectiveness.
        Am J Infect Control. 1999; 27: 258-261
        • Lucet J.C.
        • Rigaud M.P.
        • Mentre F.
        • et al.
        Hand contamination before and after different hand hygiene techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
        J Hosp Infect. 2002; 50: 276-280
        • McGinley K.J.
        • Larson E.L.
        • Leyden J.J.
        Composition and density of microflora in the subungual space of the hand.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1988; 26: 950-953
        • Tvedt C.
        • Bukholm G.
        Alcohol-based hand disinfection: a more robust hand-hygiene method in an intensive care unit.
        J Hosp Infect. 2005; 59: 229-234
        • Sickbert-Bennett E.E.
        • Weber D.J.
        • Gergen-Teague M.F.
        • Sobsey M.D.
        • Samsa G.P.
        • Rutala W.A.
        Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses.
        Am J Infect Control. 2005; 33: 67-77
        • Farrington R.M.
        • Rabindran J.
        • Crocker G.
        • Ali R.
        • Pollard N.
        • Dalton H.R.
        ‘Bare below the elbows’ and quality of hand washing: a randomised comparison study.
        J Hosp Infect. 2010; 74: 86-88
        • Fierer N.
        • Hamady M.
        • Lauber C.L.
        • Knight R.
        The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105: 17994-17999
        • Kim M.K.
        • Patel R.A.
        • Shinn A.H.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of gender difference in skin type and pH.
        J Dermatol Sci. 2006; 41: 153-156
        • Steinlechner C.W.G.
        • Cumberland N.
        Microbes on ties: do they correlate with wound infection?.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002; 84: 307-309
        • Gerken A.
        • Cavanagh S.
        • Winner H.I.
        Infection hazard from stethoscopes in hospital.
        Lancet. 1972; 1: 1214-1215
        • Datz C.
        • Jungwirth A.
        • Dusch H.
        • Galvan G.
        • Weiger T.
        What's on doctors' ball point pens?.
        Lancet. 1997; 350: 1824
        • Bianchi M.T.
        Desiderata or dogma: what the evidence reveals about physician attire.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23: 641-643
        • Colt H.G.
        • Solot J.A.
        Attitudes of patients and physicians regarding physician dress and demeanor in the emergency department.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18: 145-151
        • Rehman S.U.
        • Nietert P.J.
        • Cope D.W.
        • Kilpatrick A.O.
        What to wear today? Effect of doctor's attire on the trust and confidence of patients.
        Am J Med. 2005; 118: 1279-1286
        • Biant L.C.
        • Teare E.L.
        • Williams W.W.
        • Tuite J.D.
        Eradication of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus by “ring fencing” of elective orthopaedic beds.
        Br Med J. 2004; 329: 149-151
        • Robert J.
        • Fridkin S.K.
        • Blumberg H.M.
        • et al.
        The influence of the composition of the nursing staff on primary bloodstream infection rates in a surgical intensive care unit.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000; 21: 12-17
        • Archibald L.K.
        • Manning M.L.
        • Bell L.M.
        • Banerjee S.
        • Jarvis W.R.
        Patient density, nurse-to-patient ratio and nosocomial infection risk in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.
        Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997; 16: 1045-1048